You may or may not know this, but you can do limited HTML markup in comments on blogs that run on the Blogger software (*.blogspot.com websites).
I will occasionally use tags (you can use lower-case or upper-case i’s, it doesn’t matter) to italicize text in a comment. I like to do this to another person’s text that I am responding to, so it’s clear the text wasn’t written by me.
Example:
What I type:
Hey, how’s it going, Splotchy?
Fine, thanks for asking!
The text above gets displayed in the comment as:
Hey, how’s it going, Splotchy?
Fine, thanks for asking!
Well, I noticed when I tried to italicize some text in a comment earlier this week that things are a little different. When I previewed the comment it looked fine, but when I actually published the thing there were no line breaks.
Instead, the comment appeared like this:
Hey, how’s it going, Splotchy?Fine, thanks for asking!
Icky, eh?
Previously, Blogger was converting my line breaks into HTML line breaks, which are represented by the
tag. Now, it appears that they have modified their software. If Blogger now sees an HTML tag included in a comment, it no longer converts line breaks to the
tags recognized by browsers.
A little sidenote for those who want to know. A line break in an HTML source file does not equal a line break in a browser. Blogger does the heavy lifting of converting the line breaks that you make in your blog posts to HTML line breaks (
— case doesn’t matter here — it could just as well be
).
So, you have the option of giving up your use of italics in comments, or you can be a little amateur HTML coder and add a
to force a line break yourself.
Here’s an example how to do it:
What I type:
Hey, how’s it going, Splotchy?
Fine, thanks for asking!
Which will display in a comment as:
Hey, how’s it going, Splotchy?
Fine, thanks for asking!
Anyways, I’m a geek. Happy commenting! Feel free to give this a try on this post, you nice people, you.
Try it with and without the
tags if’n you don’t believe me.
No way. So that’s what happened here. I’m not sure I would have made the connection between tag use & the sudden need to insert my own line breaks, so thanks for spelling it out. Also? I bet they fix it, cause that there? Is pretty obnoxious.
Whoa, I like your teaching methods. Nice and spelled out for us nongeeks. Thanks!
I had not yet discovered that, so I am using “< em >< /em > a I usually do to italicize.
and then…
I’m testing the break thing.
It worked ok w/ em, rather than i for me there- putting the break in for me.
Is that what you were talking about?
This is all too techno-wizardly. You should have included a diagram in crayon for us dumbasses.
Hmm.
This line uses emThis line uses i
I don’t know what you did Freida, both em and i collapse the lines if I don’t explicitly put the HTML line breaks in them.
can you come and give me a full lesson
Try
instead of .
I would consider by itself as malformed HTML — what I was doing was indicating an empty tag via
.
Actually, I used to just put
to do line breaks in the HTML I edited way back in the 20th century, but since then I have worked with so much XML that I can’t help bring its empty tag syntax back with me.
Thanks for pointing out the simpler way.
Splotchy, thanks a bunch. That was driving me nuts. I was using only one
and getting the words on the next line, which I did not like. You are my hero.
You are my hero.
Yes, you are.
And Dr. Zaius, you, too. Even simpler. Yay!
And careful with the preview option. It seems to process comment formatting the old way, just to confuse us.
this is so annoyingtesting em
again with emI’m done.